One of the most exciting attributes of captive insurance is that every program looks different. There is so much variety and a wide range of ways to structure coverage and utilize surplus. I have been talking with captive owners representing various industries, organizational sizes, and stages of captive maturation to get their unique stories and understand how they are putting their captive to work for their specific risks. Indeed, no two stories have been the same.

In a recent interview, I sat down with Karen Hsi, Executive Director, Captive Programs at University of California Office of the President, and one of the sharpest minds of young captive talent. The University of California (UC) did not need to obtain Department of Labor (DOL) approval for their captive programs, making the process simpler!

Q: What benefits do you currently have within your captive, and why did you choose the captive path?

A: On the employee benefits side, we have voluntary benefits – accident, critical illness, and hospital indemnity – in our cell captive. This program has been in effect since the start of 2020 and uses a fronting carrier, and as of this year (start of 2024), it is 100% seeded to the cell captive.

We brought these products into the captive because we wanted to customize offerings and add some bells and whistles for employees at a better price. We used a cell captive so that we wouldn’t jeopardize the tax status of our single parent captive. Our original goal with this strategy was not to make money but  break-even while primarily to be able to offer better benefits.

Over the course of time we have been able to build a stable program, and after shifting away from a broker structure so that commissions and other costs are stripped out. As we establish these financial efficiencies, we want to keep building upon the program either by reducing employee costs or by further enhancing or customizing offerings. For example, one unique benefit that we were able to add with our surplus is a mammography offering within critical illness. We found that utilization was high, so we are confident it adds value to employees. Another policy we were able to add into the supplemental health program was a COVID-19 rider, which had a cash incentive for employees to proactively get tested for the virus. We were able to put this in place quickly and think we would have had a hard time doing so without the captive.

Overall, we have seen about 20% savings with this program and as things stabilize, we hope to lower rates further for employees.

Q: Are there any other benefits UC has in a captive?

A: We write life insurance – employer and employee paid – in a separate cell captive because it is large enough for its own cell. The life cell captive also launched in 2019 and is doing well, with approximately $16.3M in accumulated earnings since inception. During the pandemic, we had a fair amount of turnover, so we used the success of the captive to boost our life insurance policy as a tactic for succession planning and business continuity.

We hope to someday to move disability into the captive, but the timing hasn’t been right yet. We want to better manage the risk first so that the board is more amenable to bringing it into the captive.

Q: Any other surprises?

A: I think in the beginning it was a mindset and relationship change when we shifted things with the carrier to move to a fronting company. They now have a seat at the table and we have a longstanding relationship.

Q: Anything interesting on the horizon?

A: We are looking into the potential of long-term care insurance in a captive. There also might be an opportunity to rent out a cell captive to one of our sister/affiliate organizations (e.g., California State entities), where they have their own cell and voice and where we can provide resources. I think this might be a beneficial move and would be a valuable way to collaborate.

No matter what the future brings, I know that we are not done yet (with growing our captive programs), and we’re excited to see what else we can do. I appreciated the time Karen spent in chatting with me and will be paying close attention to these exciting developments and opportunities to expand their captive. If you’re looking for expert advice to assess feasibility of additional benefits in your captive, feel free to get in touch with our team.

The United States Department of Labor (DOL) has tentatively authorized an Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) exemption regarding pension plan risk transfer to a captive. This healthcare network is the first organization in history to receive ERISA approval to transfer pension risk in a captive. This is groundbreaking news, as it opens the doors for plan sponsors to better manage their risk related to defined benefit pension plans programs. In short, using captive insurance companies rather than traditional insurers alone gives plan sponsors the opportunity to fund their pension risk more cost effectively.

Their employees engage in groundbreaking cancer research and provide lifesaving care for patients. The employer engaged with Spring, to help design and implement this unique program for its retirement benefits. This included conducting actuarial analyses, navigating vendor and partner avenues, structuring transaction and direct contact with the DOL to work through the exemption process. Once approved, the employer is anticipated to receive $126.4 million in financial benefits from the DOL. As part of the terms of the exemption, the employer will be providing a one-time cost of living increase to the monthly retirement benefit to all plan participants and beneficiaries.

This is a groundbreaking next step in the evolution of risk management programs and set the stage for many other employers who are trying to structure a better program for their employees.

We’re excited to announce that Spring has been shortlisted for top Actuarial Firm and Captive Consultant in this Captive Review’s 2024 US Awards. Check out the full list of nominees here.

Our Managing Partner, Karin Landry has been featured among the top Influential Women in Captive Insurance by Captive International. You can find the full announcement here.

For the first time, the United States Department of Labor (DOL) has tentatively authorized an Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) exemption regarding pension plan risk transfer to a captive. Spring worked directly with this client through the process and once approved, the client is anticipated to receive $126.4 million in financial benefits from the DOL. Check out Captive Intelligence’s full article here.

Since I started my career in this space many moons ago, I have seen the captive industry continuously grow and evolve. There have been new risks, changes in regulatory and Department of Labor (DOL) policies and protocols, economic fluctuations, the addition of technologies, and the integration of captive programs focused on different lines, whether employee benefits or property and casualty (P&C). As I believe we are at the cusp of the next era of change for captives, I wanted to connect with captive owners and risk managers to gather their outlook on where we are today and where we’re headed.

I sat down with David Arick, who is currently the President of RIMS, the risk management society® and Managing Director, Global Risk Management at Sedgwick. He has previously held insurance and risk management roles at companies like International Paper and General Electric, and brings forth a wide range of experience spanning decades.

Q: How has the hard insurance market impact risk professionals’ ability to financial cover their organizations’ top risks?

A: Different industries have had different experiences in this market. My last job was in the packaging and forest products industry and it, along with other sectors like transportation, have been challenged. The hard market coupled with specific insurance conditions like nuclear verdicts and natural disasters on the P&C side have been driving up property costs. Cyber insurance has also faced obstacles. The economics of a specific company along with the insurance budgets that get blown out of the water really have people looking for alternatives like captives.

Q: What do you feel are some of the contributing factors that have led to the increased popularity in captives?

A: Aside from what I mentioned above, captives are no longer uncommon or kept behind closed doors; they are now a part of mainstream risk management and C-suites are willing to make the investment given the volatile insurance markets they are facing.

Q: What benefits are most appropriate for organizations to place in their captives? Have you seen any new developments in this area?

A: From a risk management perspective, I hear my fellow risk managers talking about three areas where benefits and captives can interplay:

1. Global benefits. Risk managers are hoping that captives can help stabilize programs that historically were variable and volatile across different countries, particularly with a workforce moving between countries.
2. Medical stop-loss. Captives are playing a huge role in this area where a risk manager can partner with HR in understanding stop loss buying options available thanks to the captive and also creating savings and flexibility within the program.
3. ERISA benefits. Multinational companies have been focused here in terms of trends, take-up rates, etc. Benefits spend in the US is more significant than in other countries and to that end there is renewed interest in utilizing a captive to address these rising costs.

Q: I’ve heard you say before, “risk management is much more than buying insurance or financing losses,” can you elaborate on that statement a bit?

A: Both risk management and insurance buying are critical aspects of running a business. The point is that I would hope that risk management could be more strategic, aimed at creating risk awareness and focused on people, processes, and technology in addition to the more traditional items like mitigation plans, business continuity and the like.

Q: This year, as RIMS President, what are some of your priorities for the organization and the risk management profession overall?

A: I would like to improve the perception of risk management by increasing education and development for those in the field, so that we can more broadly speak the same language. RIMS has developed a global certification for risk management education called the RIMS-CRMP that is ANSI-accredited and meant to build credibility around the profession. We are investing in our future by highlighting the careers available and introducing risk management curricula to more colleges and universities. It’s important that we routinely assess how to support new talent that joins the field in their professional growth and that is what we’re focused on. 

Q: What insights can you offer a risk professional who is either considering starting a captive or who has just started one?

A: I promise you didn’t make me answer the question in this way, but I truly think organizations need to search for the best captive advisors and not just default to their primary brokerage team. An existing team may be sufficient in handling most needs, but a captive is unique and you need an expert team in place, from consultants to lawyers, to captive managers and the like. Secondly, I will say that a risk management professional needs to prioritize building internal support and alignment for an initiative like a captive, including finance, accounting, treasury, legal, and tax. Internal buy-in is critical to long-term success.

As society increasingly pivots towards clean and green energy solutions, driven by the imperative of sustainability and the dramatic effects of climate change, the energy landscape is undergoing a profound transformation. Companies across all industries are embracing renewable alternatives and adopting environmentally conscious practices. This shift can lead to many obstacles when it comes to liabilities and coverage. Last week, I had the pleasure of attending the International Risk Management Institute (IRMI)’s Energy Risk & Insurance Conference (ERIC) which tackled this very issue. Experts across the risk management industry convened to discuss emerging energy risks and potential solutions. I had the pleasure of presenting on this topic, “Captives—Too Late for Fossil Fuels or Too Soon for Green Energy?” and wanted to share some key insights.

The Legacy of Traditional Energy

For decades, traditional energy sources like coal, oil, and natural gas have served as the pillars of global energy infrastructure. These sources have powered industries, fueled transportation, and sustained economies worldwide. However, their reliance on finite resources and contribution to environmental degradation have brought their sustainability priorities into question.

While traditional energy remains deeply entrenched in global economies, its future is increasingly uncertain. Mounting pressure to reduce carbon emissions, coupled with the emergence of renewable alternatives, has catalyzed a shift towards cleaner energy sources.

The Promise of Renewable Energy

The rise of renewable energy technologies such as solar, wind, and hydroelectric power represents a socio-economic shift towards sustainability. These sources offer cleaner alternatives, reducing carbon emissions and mitigating the impacts of climate change. Their abundance and renewable nature make them promising candidates for a greener future.

However, the transition to renewable energy has its challenges. The intermittency of renewable sources coupled with the need for infrastructure investments, presents hurdles to widespread adoption. The inertia of traditional energy industries along with regulatory complexities further slow down the pace of transition.

The Role of Captive Insurance

Amidst this energy transition, captive insurance has been at the forefront for risk management teams trying to optimize coverage and reduce costs. With few regulations, many insurers are moving away from insuring coal and creating more inclusive policies for oil and gas. It is estimated that 62% of reinsurers now have coal exit policies and 38% have oil and gas exclusions as shift away from fossil fuels accelerates.¹ Insurance coverages and costs coupled with sustainability priorities have many organizations questioning if switching to alternative energy sources is critical.

On the other end of the stick, insuring green/new energy has not been easy. Although we are seeing new coverages such as leakage insurance for CO₂, and coverage for solar, hydrogen, and bioenergy, pricing and underwriting remain huge issues. With any new risks, there are still untested coverages and language that may lead to future conflict when claims are filed. Many insurers also worry about the scalability of the new coverages once many companies shift to green energy; how will the underwriting processes and pricing shift or scale once more companies adopt green energy?

This natural lack of transition had sprouted a giant funding dilemma of insuring energy companies. Although many large companies are self-insured and/or adopt captive insurance as a solution, often mid and smaller companies are stuck in no-man’s-land. Many of these companies are looking into alternative funding options, such as a group captive, to help share risks with similar organizations without paying obscene premiums. This allows mid and smaller energy companies to meet lender requirements at lower rates and reduce net costs through reinsurance.

Where are Things Headed?

I expect in the coming years we may see drastic changes in how energy companies are insured; a lot depends on how committed commercial insurers are to exiting certain industries and promoting new energy coverages. There seem to be certain lines/industries that scale faster, both with regard to comprehensive underwriting processes and pricing volatility. Another significant consideration is governmental/regulatory changes. With climate change as a major political issue, policyholders and insurance companies may need to adapt more quickly if regulations are passed pushing for the use of green energy.

In conclusion, the dichotomy between old and new energy and how to properly insure them is a hot-button topic in the risk world. As older energy sources, such as coal, are becoming more and more uninsurable, newer green energy sources are untested and challenging to underwrite. We are in an interesting position where insurance companies and policyholders know they must shift towards renewable energy but cannot properly insure it (yet). Although alternative funding options, such as captive insurance, have proved thus far to be a solution, there are still so many unforeseen variables that will undoubtedly affect how energy is insured.

¹ https://global.insure-our-future.com/with-new-coal-uninsurable-insurers-start-to-move-on-oil-and-gas/

In a recent podcast from Global Captive Podcast, president and CEO of edRISK, Tracy Hassett, and our SVP, Prabal Lakhanpal, dive into the history of edRISK and how educational institutions have been able to leverage a captive to reduce health insurance costs and reduce liability. You can find the full podcast episode here.

Our SVP, Prabal Lakhanpal, was featured in a panel discussion alongside other CICA NextGen participants to discuss how to best attract younger talent, obstacles the industry is currently facing, and the future of careers futures in captive insurance. You can find the full discussion here.