As we close in on the midway point of President Biden’s term, it is a good time to reflect on policy changes to date, as well as expected shifts in the near future related to employee benefits.

Ooh, We’re Halfway There: Key Changes From Biden’s Presidency So Far

With a focus on healthcare and employee benefits, here are some key Presidential activities that have occurred during the last two years (please note, this is not an exhaustive list).

Let’s dive a little deeper into some of these:

Looking ahead, we can’t be sure what President Biden will prioritize during the second half of his term, but in the healthcare sphere we are likely to see a renewal of healthcare extenders, a debate around the topic of healthcare sector consolidation, substance abuse solutions, and strategies for managing the healthcare labor shortage. The COVID-19 Public Health Emergency (PHE) may or may not end in January 2023, which would impact Medicaid, as well as support programs and flexibilities offered, such as those related to telehealth.

A Split Congress

With a Republican-led House of Representatives and a majority Democratic Senate, we may be facing some standoffs at the federal level in the years to come. However, like Biden’s infrastructure law, there are some bipartisan issues that may see movement. Policies around paid leave, including sick leave, healthcare technology, and pharmacy costs may have enough support from both sides of the aisle to see progress.

Stateside

November’s midterm elections had many of us holding our breath, with several tight races in a divisive environment. The overturning of Roe vs. Wade meant many states had abortion-related questions on the ballot, with California, Michigan and Vermont passing measures that would protect abortion access and Kentucky failing to pass a law that would outright deny the right to an abortion. Health plans and employers alike have had to reassess their coverage related to these changes and consider new components, such as travel costs.

In other state election results, interesting activity was not in short supply. South Dakota approved a constitutional amendment that will extend Medicaid eligibility under the ACA to those with income below 138% of the federal poverty level., which is $26,500 for a household of four. This will take effect on July 1, 2023. Arizona passed an initiative that will limit interest rates to 3% for debt resulting from healthcare services, a cap that previously fell at 10%. Maryland voted to form a workgroup to advise on a subsidy program to support small businesses and is exploring a single-payer commission platform. Massachusetts also voted in favor of looking into a single-payer system and a public option, as well as a pilot program expanding eligibility for the Massachusetts health insurance subsidy program, and became the first state to regulate dental insurance. Meanwhile, newly elected Governor Lombardo of Nevada may be seeking to disrupt the 2021 bill calling for a public option for individual and small group markets.

At Spring, we take an objective stance on employee benefits and health plan design, always looking out for the best interests of our clients. Federal political stalemate aside, we do think changes in employee benefits will keep coming, and it’s best to be as proactive as possible. We will continue to keep you updated on changes in the employee benefits and healthcare spheres, if you have questions about recent legislature or need compliance guidance, please get in touch.

On National Pharmacist Day, our Assistant Vice President of Pharmacy, Jennifer Perlitch, a clinical pharmacist, is offering her view and surprising facts about the pharmacy industry today, as well as how she’s helping Spring’s clients combat the difficult climate.

The fact that pharmacy costs continue to skyrocket is not groundbreaking news. But what many people aren’t aware of is the “why” behind the increases. Several factors influence the price of a prescription drug such as the drug’s uniqueness and effectiveness and how much, if any, competition exists in the market. Unfortunately, there are times when drug prices increase significantly without important new clinical evidence. Regardless of why, as these prices continue to increase, it creates a significant burden on patients who need to pay deductibles or coinsurance.

So, what’s going on behind the scenes? Pharmacy is just one piece of the healthcare puzzle, and we know overall healthcare costs are also on the rise. There are five key reasons why healthcare costs are rising1:

When it comes to pharmacy specifically, there are two of these areas that I want to dive further into.

Chronic Disease Prevalence

Six out of every 10 adults in the United States have a chronic disease or condition, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The most common chronic conditions in the U.S. include:

Chronic conditions often require long-term medical attention and prescription drugs which often delay disease progression and improve or preserve quality of life. Some conditions may limit daily living activities, which could warrant use of home health care or other support services. The challenges of living with chronic illness also may increase the likelihood of suffering from anxiety, depression, and other mood disorders.

All these factors make caring for chronic disease patients more complex and resource intensive. There is a strong relationship between healthcare costs and chronic diseases in the United States. According to a report from the American Action Forum, the U.S. spends about $3.7 trillion each year for the treatment of chronic health conditions and the resulting loss of economic productivity.

In addition, the COVID-19 pandemic has caused some chronic disease patients to delay or avoid essential care. This means that chronic disease patients are spending less on healthcare services in the short term, but this will likely have damaging health and financial effects in the long term. When chronic disease patients delay care, they risk suffering from potentially life-threatening complications as a result. The long-term management of these complications will likely contribute to rising national health expenditures and consumer costs.

Rising Drug Prices

According to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), the average American spent about $1,226 on prescription drugs in 2019 (the most recent year with internationally comparable data). This per capita cost is significantly higher than other developed countries. These costs will likely continue to increase, as the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) estimates that prescription drug spending in the U.S. will grow by 6.1 percent each year through 2027.

The spending growth is due in part to a continuing emphasis on specialty medications and precision medicine. Specialty drugs are high-cost prescription medications used to treat complex conditions such as autoimmune diseases, chronic conditions, and cancers. Some therapies utilize genetic data to deliver a highly targeted, personalized treatment. The complex nature of these drugs makes them very costly to develop and distribute.

Drug pricing strategies also contribute to rising healthcare costs. Drug manufacturers establish a list price based on their product’s estimated value, and manufacturers can raise this list price as they see fit. In the U.S., there are few regulations to prevent manufacturers from inflating drug prices. There is no federal oversight; the federal government does not regulate drug pricing. It does however encourage the development of generic drugs through an abbreviated approval process to help improve access and affordability, but this often takes years.

Private Health Insurance and Out-of-Pocket Costs

Private health insurance spending growth accelerated slightly to 4.5 percent in 2018, from 4.2 percent in 2017. This trend is the net effect of faster spending growth in many services such as physician and clinical services and prescription drugs, which were only partly offset by slower projected growth in the net cost of private health insurance spending. In 2019, private health insurance spending growth slowed to 3.3 percent, which, in part, reflects the estimated impact of the effective repeal of the individual mandate within the Affordable Care Act (ACA). Over the latter period of the projection, 2020-27, private health insurance spending is projected to grow by 5.1 percent per year on average (or 1.8 percentage points more rapidly on average than in 2019) resulting mainly from the lagged response to higher projected income growth, especially in 2020-22.

Out-of-pocket (OOP) spending growth is projected to have grown faster at 3.6 percent in 2018, from 2.6 percent in 2017, due to faster income growth, as well as higher average deductibles for private health insurance enrollees with employer sponsored insurance. During 2020-27, out of pocket spending growth is projected to accelerate to an average annual rate of 5.0 percent, which is a similar rate as private health insurance during this period. During this timeframe, somewhat faster growth was projected for 2022, a year in which OOP spending was anticipated to grow 5.4 percent related to the excise tax on high-cost insurance plans3.

How can the Spring Consulting Team help?

As an employer you want the best for your employees and their families. Ensuring your pharmacy benefits meet their needs and supports their well-being is a critical component of your benefits package.

Evaluating your current pharmacy benefit offerings is an excellent place to start!

Here is an overview of our Pharmacy Benefits Consulting Services:

Evaluate current Pharmacy Benefit Management (PBM) Services

– Conduct annual/semi-annual reviews of PBM services, contract compliance, and performance guarantees and provide recommendations/assist in developing a plan to rectify any deficiencies.
– Perform follow-up activities as necessary to ensure contract compliance, efficient program management and responsive account management
– Review and evaluate utilization and any other key reports to assess trends/areas for opportunity

New PBM Implementation Services

– Facilitate implementation of the new PBM services including transition of benefit design, formulary, eligibility and pre-existing prior authorization approvals to new PBM

Pharmacy Benefit Consulting Services

– Review pharmacy benefit packages options and assist in selecting best option for your business needs
– Evaluate and recommend options for managing specialty pharmacy products
– Analyze the performance of the retail, mail order, and specialty pharmacy benefit option and make recommendations to improve the management of the drug cost trends
– Review and evaluate clinical and other optional programs and provide recommendations
– Meet with key stakeholders semi-annually (or quarterly) to review drug plan performance and identify recommended changes going forward.

Account Management Services

– Manage the ongoing relationship and communications with the PBM regarding specific eligibility and benefit updates
– Represent and advocate for business needs with the PBM when needed
– Participate in all PBM and client meetings related to pharmacy benefit and mail order services

Given the perfect storm outlined above, now is a great time to reassess all your benefits programs, but especially those related to pharmacy; please get in touch if you would like to optimize in this area.

1 https://www.definitivehc.com/blog/5-reasons-why-healthcare-costs-are-rising
2 https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2785479
3 https://www.cms.gov/Research-Statistics-Data-and-Systems/Statistics-Trends-and-Reports/NationalHealthExpendData/Downloads/ForecastSummary.pdf

Paid Family and Medical Leave continues to be a confusing point for employers, compounded by new legislation being proposed at a seemingly constant pace. As leaders in the disability and absence management space, we are dedicated to staying on top of updates around PFML, among other areas.  After a busy year in that regard, with another on the horizon, we wanted to share this brief overview.

In 2022, there was more movement towards state PFML laws being passed after decreased activity in previous years, largely due to the COVID-19 pandemic. For example:

In 2023, we expect continued activity. Pennsylvania and Michigan have outstanding proposals for PFML, which will likely be decided upon in 2023, one way or another. Additional states may also put forward proposals in upcoming legislative sessions.  

In addition, and as seen in the updates below, states with existing legislation continue to make adjustments to their PFML programs. Adjustments to contributions and benefits are typically expected, most commonly, but not always, at the end of the calendar year.

The map below shows a summary of states with existing PFML legislation and programs in place, those who have proposed legislation without it being passed, and those that have not had any activity related to PFML in recent years.

Massachusetts

In 2023, Massachusetts will be updating maximum benefit amounts and reducing total contributions.

The maximum weekly benefit is increasing to $1,129.82, effective 1/1/2023. This is an increase of about $45 from the 2022 weekly maximum. For any employees who may have leave that runs from 2022 into 2023, the weekly benefit that was determined when leave was approved will continue. The new maximum will not be applied until there is a new MA PFML leave application.

Contributions, however, will be reduced in 2023. The total contribution is decreasing from 0.68% to 0.63%, for employers with 25 or more covered individuals. The medical leave contribution will be 0.52%, with employers funding 0.312% and employees responsible for up to 0.208%. The family leave contribution will be 0.11%, with employers able to collect the total contribution from employees. Employers with less than 25 employees are not required to submit the employer portion of premium.

Other State Updates

Other states have made updates to their programs effective January 1, 2023, unless otherwise noted below. Some states may make changes off calendar year (e.g., District of Columbia, Rhode Island), which are not included if they have not yet been released.

Employers should review their PFML plans, policies, and processes to confirm they are in line with any legislative changes. To do so, the following checklist can be followed:

If you need assistance ensuring PFML compliance or assessing the optimal plan set up for your organization, Spring’s consultants are happy to help.

Our Senior Vice President, Prabal Lakhanpal was quoted in an Captive Intelligence article on how captives can be utilized in the private equity space. You can find the full article here.

After a two-year hiatus, it was great being able to attend The Cayman Captive Forum in person this year. As the Cayman Islands is the second largest captive domicile, and the first for healthcare captives1; it is the perfect location to share leading trends in the captive world, and the warm temperatures and tropical views made it all the more enjoyable. If you weren’t able to attend or could use a refresher after returning to the “real world,” this quick recap might be of interest. Below are some of the buzziest topics at this year’s conference.

Spring Consulting Group Booth

1) Tax Updates

On large attraction to captive insurance (and certain domiciles) relates to tax advantages. It’s complicated, though. Some of the tax-focused sessions presented at the conference were:

– Mike Domanski, a lawyer from Honigman LLP, discussed offshore federal tax considerations and U.S. tax reporting requirements in his session titled “Captive Insurance: Basic Tax Fundamentals.”

– In a session titled “The State of Tax: What You Need to Know,” experts discussed U.S. federal tax updates and how taxes will be affected by the Inflation Reduction Act and updates to Section 831(b).

– The penultimate presentation titled, “U.S. Tax Update” tackled IRS and compliance updates in the U.S. on both the federal and state levels.

2) Cyber Risks

Since the start of the pandemic, employers had to adjust to remote and hybrid workplace policies. This transition forced employers and employees to rely more on digital tools to conduct day-to-day operations and made organizations more susceptible to breaches. This is not the first year that cyber took the spotlight, but there were some great discussions around risk in this area, including:

3) Healthcare-Specific Coverages

In recent years, we have been seeing an increasing number of healthcare organizations leverage their captive to bring new and industry-specific lines. At this year’s Cayman Captive Forum we learned about how captives can be used for the following emerging and alternative risks:

a) Medical Malpractice/Medical Errors

As the Cayman Islands is the most popular captive domicile amongst healthcare organizations, there was a large focus on healthcare-specific risks. There was a particular emphasis on how healthcare employers can reduce and prepare for potential medical malpractice/errors as noted in the following sessions:

b) Workplace Safety & Patient Care

Workplace safety is another non-traditional captive line (outside of employee benefits and Property and Casualty [P&C]) gaining traction. Healthcare organizations and, more specifically, healthcare workers and patients are prone to violence and discrimination more so than staff in other industries.

– In the session “Workplace Violence in Healthcare,” Trinity Health’s Diane Moritz explained initiatives their captive board are taking to prevent workplace violence injuries and support victims of patient violence.

– Children’s National Hospital’s Chief Diversity Officer, Denice Cora-Bramble discussed biases in data reporting for diverse patients, and experiences minority patients face when seeking health services in the session, “DEI Impact on Quality and Safety of Care.”

– I was joined by lawyer, Michael Domanski in a pre-recorded session titled “Using a Captive to Fund Long-Term Care,” during which we reviewed the current LTC market and different captive models (both taxable and tax-exempt) that can cover long-term care policies.

As we transition into a new era of captive insurance, this year’s Cayman Captive Forum acted as a perfect vehicle for addressing current and future themes in the industry. It was a strong end (almost) to an exciting year and we look forward to next year’s conference to continue these and other important discussions. Our team was fortunate to be part of the action in the Cayman Islands this year and is here to answer any questions you may have related to an existing or new captive program. Check out our captive expertise here and let’s chat!

1 https://caymanintinsurance.ky/about/

As seen on Alera Group’s Insights Page

In the cyclical market for Property and Casualty Insurance, we are more than a year into hard-market conditions, leading growing numbers of businesses to consider alternative risk funding. That, in turn, has created an abundance of work for insurance actuaries and Captive Insurance consultants.

OK, that’s a lot of insurance speak for one paragraph. Let’s unpack:

— A hard market for insurance is characterized by a rise in rates, a reduction in options for coverage, heightened scrutiny by policy underwriters and reduced carrier capacity for coverage limits. A combination of catastrophic weather events and so-called “nuclear verdicts” in liability lawsuits — as well as the cyclical nature of the Property and Casualty (P&C) Insurance market — were the driving forces behind the hardened conditions before the onset of COVID-19, and the pandemic exacerbated matters. Rate increases have leveled off to some extent in 2022, but, in general, most conditions in the market remain unfavorable to consumers.

— Alternative risk funding — also known as alternative risk financing or alternative risk transfer — is a mechanism for providing coverage by means other than commercial insurance. Types of alternative risk funding include Captive Insurance programs, in which a business or group of like businesses creates and funds its own private insurance company to cover one or more risks in the realms of both P&C and employee benefits. Workers’ Compensation, General Liability, Auto, Professional Liability and Medical Stop-Loss are the more common coverages to start with when insuring through a captive, but captives often expand into a funding mechanism for many of an organization’s other lines of insurance, including Cyber and Umbrella (also known as Excess Liability Insurance).

— Insurance actuaries use math, statistics and financial models to analyze the cost of risk and determine how much money a company should pay to protect itself against risk. All insurance carriers employ actuaries to help set policy premiums and limits. Some insurance agencies work with actuaries to negotiate policy details with carriers or, in a captive arrangement, to determine a premium that will cover claims and, in the long term, reduce the insured’s total cost of risk. Captives have the advantage of also building up retained earnings over time and allowing companies to take on more risk, generating additional insurance cost savings for the parent. Among multiple P&C capabilities, actuaries who work with or for an agency also educate clients on the cost of risk and how to manage it.

Now that we’ve cleared that up, let’s talk about the role of an actuary in managing the cost of risk and protecting your business with a customized insurance program — whether you’ve chosen to pursue alternative risk funding or not.

Why an Alternative Solution? And Why Now?

Business leaders know all too well about the hard market for Property and Casualty Insurance. Just as the pandemic began to wane early in 2022 and there were some signs of casualty rate increases leveling off, Russia’s invasion of Ukraine escalated supply-chain disruption and fuel shortages, accelerating the rise in economic inflation. Damage resulting from Hurricane Ian only made matters worse, of course, driving reinsurance — insurance for insurers — into what the Bank of America termed a “true hard market” of its own, with rising costs getting passed on to consumers. These issues have led to overall increases in U.S. P&C industry combined ratios over the past few quarters, sparking further rate increases for certain lines.

It’s no wonder more organizations are looking at captives and other alternative risk-funding solutions.

“Overall, between 2017 and 2021, captives added $4.3 billion to their year-end surplus while returning $5.8 billion in stockholder and policyholder dividends, representing $10.1 billion in insurance cost savings over purchasing coverage from commercial market third parties.”

“The number of U.S. captives continues to rise, although the growth of captive formations was tempered by the onset of economic uncertainty resulting from the pandemic, as well as ongoing scrutiny from the IRS and greater regulatory and reporting requirements.”

“However, these adverse conditions can serve to highlight the benefits of the captive segment and provide businesses an incentive to establish them,” said Fred Eslami, associate director, AM Best.

“‘This current environment allows captives to customize coverage for risks that may be uncommon or difficult to write or place in the standard market,’” Eslami said.

The growth in Captive Insurance has led to an increasing willingness on the part of carriers to work with captives and regard them as partners rather than threats, increasing options for captive solutions. And even if an organization in the end chooses to forgo alternative risk funding – either for an entire P&C program or for individual coverages, such as cyber or commercial umbrella – simply exploring an alternative and having it as an option can improve its position in the insurance market.

Actuary Capabilities: Your Data, Your Future 

For insurance agents and brokers, designing an insurance program tailored to your industry and company is as much art as it is science. Working with an actuary enables you to incorporate greater amounts of empirical evidence into evaluating risks and determining insurance solutions: Here’s what the numbers demonstrate about your situation now, and here’s what our analysis shows about how you’ll perform using this solution.

While any good broker will work to design an insurance program customized for your business, a broker working with an actuary will be especially well-equipped to design a solution tailored to your unique needs and goals. Among the key issues an actuary can help brokers work through are:

  1. Determining appropriate retention/deductible levels to help the client reduce the total cost of risk;
  2. Estimating client retained unpaid claims liabilities at quarter/year-end;
  3. Estimating carrier letter-of-credit need for a large deductible program; 
  4. Estimating possible retained loss outcomes at various confidence levels;
  5. Performing a captive feasibility study.

Many brokers work in silos, taking a vertical approach in evaluating risk based on industry. Actuaries generally don’t distinguish by industry; they analyze across various industries, focusing on each individual client’s loss history (including frequency and severity), claim status, policy details, exposures and risk-control program before determining financial projections for the organization. Taking the long-term view allows for consideration of fluctuations in company and market performance over a period of time, and increases the likelihood of long-term savings and profits.

Optimizing Your Insurance and Benefits Solutions

As companies grow, they generally reach a point where their claims experience is predictable across one or more lines of coverage. Able to determine such predictability, an actuary can then help you:  

If you’ve reached the point where your business is paying, say, $100,000 to $250,000 in annual premium, a group captive might be the best solution because you probably aren’t yet structured appropriately to meet the insurance tests required to form a single-parent captive and the economies of scale may not be there for a single-parent captive solution. In such a case you may need to diversify your risk with other organizations (heterogeneous or homogeneous) — in a group captive or in a shared-risk pool solution utilizing reinsurance — for at least the time being.

The bigger, more complex, more diversified a company becomes, the more a fully funded, single-parent captive emerges as an optimal solution in which the business is insuring only its own risk. A single-parent captive also allows for more coverage flexibility and transparency than a group captive program. Quite often, both benefits and P&C risks are insured by a single-parent captive.

What drives the decision to move from traditional, carrier-based insurance to a captive program is savings and, ultimately, return on investment (ROI). How? By moving expenditures that create carrier profits into the captive solution. Captives are highly efficient, with very low expense ratios, unlike carriers. Free from providing a carrier with underwriting income and investment income on held reserves, you’re able to retain this income to ultimately generate a profit and facilitate an insurance mechanism that competes with the commercial market.

An Organization-Focused Approach

In taking an organization-focused approach toward financial analysis, actuaries look not only at funding for Property and Casualty Insurance but also at spending on employee benefits. Most captive insureds will see annual savings between 10% and 40% for premiums that flow through a captive instead of the commercial market.

As we approach the end of the year, Alera Group invites you to the final event in our 2022 Engage series of employee benefits webinars, A Look Ahead to 2023: Hot Topics and Trends. Join us on Thursday, December 15 as we discuss benefits financial officers and HR professionals need to think about now — including alternative solutions — as they plan for the year ahead.

ACCESS ALERA’S WEBINAR HERE 

As the Cayman Captive Forum starts just this week. We are proud to announce Spring and our consultants have been recognized for multiple awards from Captive International’s Cayman Awards 2022. We look forward to continuing to do excellent captive work in all domiciles, including but not limited to the Cayman Islands.

Spring has been awarded for:

Background

On election day, Massachusetts voters were asked to approve or reject four ballot questions when casting their votes for Governor and Attorney General. The 2nd ballot question focused on regulating Dental Insurance, which if passed would “require that a dental insurance carrier meet an annual aggregate medical loss ratio for its covered dental benefit plans of 83 percent1” In layman’s terms, this means dental insurers will have to spend at least 83% of premiums on patient care instead of administrative costs, salaries, profits, overhead, etc. The legislation mandates that if an insurance carrier does not meet that 83% minimum requirement, they will have to issue rebates to their customers. It further allows state regulators to veto unprecedented hikes in premiums and requires that carriers are more transparent with their spending allocation.

Prior to election day, Massachusetts did not have a fixed ratio when it came to dental insurance and will soon be the first state in the nation to have a fixed dental insurance ratio. Although MA requires reporting from dental plans, there were no regulations on premiums. The proposed law sets up a protocol similar to what the Affordable Care Act (ACA) requires of health insurers, where in Massachusetts health insurance carriers must spend at least 85%-88% of premiums on care.

Over 70% of voters voted in favor of regulating dental insurance, the most one-sided response of all four ballot questions. Although at face value regulating dental insurance may seem beneficial for patients, the impacts are not cut-and-dry, and the legislation may affect multiple parties, from consumers to carriers and dentists and practice owners.

Leading up to election day, general reactions about the legislation from dental insurance carriers were negative, while it was supported by most dental practitioners. In fact, the ballot initiative was brought to fruition, in large part, due to an Orthodontist in Somerville. As we can see from the polling results, the general population, or consumers/patients, were also in favor of question #2 passing.

Potential Impacts

For patients: On the intangible side for patients/consumers, the law would provide some peace of mind that the money they pay for their dental insurance was going, in large part, to their care. There is also an indirect advantage to increased transparency, mitigating the typical confusion that surrounds insurance plans and payments. More tangibly, the change could mean that insurers are willing to cover more procedures as a means to hit their minimum requirement (good), however that could result in dental practitioners charging more (not so good).

For employers: We anticipate that the new law will give employers who sponsor a dental insurance benefit plan more control over pricing and protection against unreasonable rate increases. Since many businesses do not offer a dental plan, or offer it on a voluntary basis, the effects should be relatively small. On the other hand, if the law were to create a change in the number of carriers in the marketplace, this could have an impact on plan and network options and negotiating power.

For dental practitioners: With the change, one perspective is that dental practitioners will be able to better focus on the best care for each patient. They may also see an increase in business and revenue if insurers are allocating more dollars towards care and procedures.

For dental insurance carriers: Dental insurers largely opposed question #2 for obvious reasons, such as restrictions on how much they can charge and additional requirements they need to adhere to, but also for less obvious reasons. For example, some carriers argue that the law will require them to make up for profit loss by raising premiums, warning that they could increase by as much as 38% in the state2. They have reason to believe this law will lead to less competition in the dental insurer marketplace, which typically does not benefit the consumer.

Conclusion

Having worked with Massachusetts employers of all sizes on their benefits, including but not limited to dental insurance, as well as interfacing with insurance carriers, being the broker representative for a large percentage of dental offices in the state and working with MDS, we are looking at this update from all angles. Our expertise and decades of experience in this industry enables us to make the following conjectures about passing of ballot question #2:

  1. Dental insurance premiums may rise, but at a minimal rate
  2. We ultimately believe this is a step in the right direction as an advocate both for our employer clients and their employees, and that transparency is a positive attribute largely missing from the healthcare experience today
  3. Immediate impacts will also be minimal, but we may see some of the other factors mentioned above play out over the next few years

If you have specific questions about how the new law might impact your dental plan(s) or practices, please get in touch. In the meantime, you might be interested in watching our recent webinar, “Why Long COVID Needs Short-Term Attention” as you develop your 2023 benefits strategies.

1https://www.sec.state.ma.us/ele/ele22/information-for-voters-22/quest_2.htm
2https://www.wbur.org/news/2022/10/18/massachusetts-ballot-question-2-explainer

It is estimated that ~44 million Americans are experiencing long COVID symptoms. During a recent Spring webinar, our SVP, Teri Weber was joined by a pulmonologist and a representative from Goodpath to review common long COVID symptoms and how it is impacting productivity and claims. You can access the webinar here.